New Delhi, Nov 5 (IANS) Opposition Members of Parliament (MPs) who are part of the 31-member Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) reviewing the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024 are set to meet Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla on Tuesday to express their discontent over the alleged ‘one-sided’ actions of the committee’s chairman, BJP MP Jagdambika Pal, and his efforts to ‘force through’ the proceedings. They have also threatened to disassociate themselves from the JPC entirely if this continues.
Opposition parties raised a formal objection to the ongoing deliberations of the JPC on the Waqf Bill, 2024, accusing the government of rushing through the legislative process and undermining due parliamentary procedure.
In a letter addressed to Lok Sabha Speaker Birla, the Opposition members expressed concerns over the frequency and pace of the meetings, claiming that the Bill, which aims to amend key provisions concerning Waqf institutions in India, is being pushed without proper scrutiny and consultation.
The letter, signed by several key Opposition leaders, underscores the lack of sufficient time for proper study and deliberation on the amendments proposed in the Bill.
The Opposition leaders argue that the JPC is meeting too often, without allowing members time to adequately examine the issues raised by various stakeholders, including Muslim community organisations and government departments.
They stressed that such a fast-tracked approach undermines the thorough legal analysis necessary for such significant legislation, especially when revisiting the Waqf Acts of 1995 and 2013.
The Opposition’s primary concern revolves around the potential erosion of the secular principles embedded in the earlier Waqf legislation, which they argue, have been carefully crafted to balance religious freedoms with constitutional safeguards.
“The legal exercise being conducted through this Bill appears to be a surreptitious attempt to dilute previous laws made by Parliament, laws which protect the secular credentials of our Constitution,” the letter reads.
Opposition members also highlighted that more than 100 amendments have been introduced in the new Waqf Bill, as opposed to the government’s claim of only 44 changes.
They fear that these amendments could fundamentally alter the religious and moral fabric of Waqf institutions, particularly the Waqf Boards, which they believe could be subjected to increased political control and interference.
Pointing out the speed at which the JPC meetings are being conducted, the Opposition expressed dissatisfaction with the lack of a reasonable time gap between sittings, which they claim is essential for thorough preparation and informed participation in the committee’s meetings.
The letter references the legal maxim ‘lex prospicit non respicit (the law looks forward, not backwards)’, stressing that proper consideration should be given to past judicial decisions and legislative wisdom before making changes to the law.
The Opposition members also took issue with the unilateral decision-making process of the JPC Chairman, alleging that dates for consecutive sittings are being scheduled without proper consultation with the committee members. They argue that this approach makes it impossible for MPs to adequately prepare for their interactions with witnesses and experts.
In a pointed criticism, the Opposition warned that the JPC should not be treated as a “rubber stamp” to push the government’s desired outcome.
They cautioned that bypassing established parliamentary procedures, driven by the government’s “majority,” could result in a severe undermining of democratic norms and constitutional principles.
The letter concludes with a warning from the MPs that if these concerns are not addressed, the Opposition members may have no choice but to disassociate themselves from the JPC entirely.
“We are being stonewalled in our attempts to engage meaningfully with the process,” the letter states, emphasizing that the Opposition’s commitment to the rule of law and constitutional values could not allow them to participate in what they consider an undemocratic process.
–IANS
jk/rad
Disclaimer
The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by TodayIndia.news and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website.
Through this website you are able to link to other websites which are not under the control of TodayIndia.news We have no control over the nature, content and availability of those sites. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.
Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, TodayIndia.news takes no responsibility for, and will not be liable for, the website being temporarily unavailable due to technical issues beyond our control.
For any legal details or query please visit original source link given with news or click on Go to Source.
Our translation service aims to offer the most accurate translation possible and we rarely experience any issues with news post. However, as the translation is carried out by third part tool there is a possibility for error to cause the occasional inaccuracy. We therefore require you to accept this disclaimer before confirming any translation news with us.
If you are not willing to accept this disclaimer then we recommend reading news post in its original language.
