New Delhi, May 7 (IANS) As India executed ‘Operation Sindoor’, a notable shift was observed in the editorial tone of prominent American daily The New York Times, which for the first time referred to the perpetrators of the Pahalgam massacre as “terrorists” in its headline — a marked departure from its earlier usage of softer terms such as “militants” and “gunmen”.
The front-page headline on the NYT website stated: “India Strikes Pakistan Two Weeks After Terrorist Attack in Kashmir,” signalling a distinct editorial change that has come amid growing criticism over the paper’s earlier coverage.
The Pahalgam attack, which occurred on April 22, left 26 people dead, including 25 Indian tourists and one Nepali citizen, when they were gunned down in cold blood in Jammu and Kashmir’s Baisaran valley.
Despite the headline change, the NYT continued to use controversial terminology within the body of its report, referring to the region as “Indian-administered Kashmir” and “Indian-controlled side of Kashmir,” thus failing to acknowledge Jammu and Kashmir as an integral part of India.
This aspect of the report continues to draw flak from Indian observers and diaspora groups who argue that such language echoes Pakistan’s narrative on the region.
In its coverage of India’s retaliatory military action, the paper reported: “India said it had struck Pakistan after gathering evidence ‘pointing towards the clear involvement of Pakistan-based terrorists’ in last month’s attack on civilians.”
It also highlighted India’s emphasis that the response was “measured, responsible and designed to be non-escalatory in nature” and that “only known terror camps” were targeted during the overnight operation.
The newspaper’s usage of the term “terrorist” in its headline gained widespread attention, particularly in view of the backlash it had received last month for its initial portrayal of the Pahalgam attackers.
At that time, critics slammed the NYT for describing the attackers merely as “militants” or “gunmen”, with many pointing out that such descriptions significantly downplayed the brutality of the incident.
The backlash was amplified by a post on social media platform X from the US House Foreign Affairs Committee, which shared a screenshot of the original NYT headline, “At Least 24 Tourists Gunned Down by Militants in Kashmir,” with the word “militants” crossed out and replaced with “terrorists” in bold red.
The Committee wrote, “Hey, @nytimes we fixed it for you. This was a TERRORIST ATTACK plain and simple. Whether it’s India or Israel, when it comes to TERRORISM the NYT is removed from reality.”
The framing of the Pahalgam attack as merely a “shooting” has also provoked sharp criticism from various quarters of the US government and Indian diplomatic channels, who argue that such terminology grossly understates the nature of the atrocity.
–IANS
sd/rad
Disclaimer
The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by TodayIndia.news and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website.
Through this website you are able to link to other websites which are not under the control of TodayIndia.news We have no control over the nature, content and availability of those sites. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.
Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, TodayIndia.news takes no responsibility for, and will not be liable for, the website being temporarily unavailable due to technical issues beyond our control.
For any legal details or query please visit original source link given with news or click on Go to Source.
Our translation service aims to offer the most accurate translation possible and we rarely experience any issues with news post. However, as the translation is carried out by third part tool there is a possibility for error to cause the occasional inaccuracy. We therefore require you to accept this disclaimer before confirming any translation news with us.
If you are not willing to accept this disclaimer then we recommend reading news post in its original language.
