HomeTop StoriesGujarat HC directs Rajkot sessions court to hear victim's advocate in Aatkot...

Gujarat HC directs Rajkot sessions court to hear victim’s advocate in Aatkot gang rape case

Rajkot, Oct 22 (IANS) Gujarat High Court has ordered the Rajkot Sessions Court to ensure that the advocate of the victim in the Aatkot gang rape case is given a fair and effective hearing during the bail proceedings of the accused.

The court also emphasised adherence to the Supreme Court’s ruling in the “Lakhimpur Kheri” case, stressing the victim’s right to be heard at every stage of the criminal process.

The case stems from an FIR filed on July 25, 2024, at Aatkot Police Station against Paresh Radadiya and Madhu Tadhani, who are charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, including gang rape (Section 376D), based on an allegation from a student residing at D.B. Patel Institutes of Education’s girls’ hostel.

The incident involves the alleged assault of a hostel inmate by a trustee and his associate.

Following a cursory investigation, the chargesheet was filed on September 16, 2024. Two of the accused have yet to be arrested. During the investigation, both accused remained at large, only surrendering to the police on their own terms.

Accused Paresh Radadiya initially sought anticipatory bail, which Sessions Judge Tamakhuwala denied, citing strong prima facie evidence.

However, after the chargesheet was filed, the same judge granted Radadiya’s regular bail, despite inconsistencies in the victim’s statements and without properly hearing the victim’s advocate. This led to an appeal in the Gujarat High Court for the cancellation of his bail.

Similarly, when the second accused, Madhu Tadhani, applied for bail, the victim’s advocate was again denied an opportunity for oral submissions.

The victim’s legal team subsequently approached the Gujarat High Court, arguing that the Sessions Court had failed to uphold the Supreme Court’s guidelines, particularly the ruling in the “Lakhimpur Kheri” case, which mandates the victim’s right to be heard during bail applications.

Exercising its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Gujarat High Court directed the Sessions Court to comply with this directive and ensure the victim’s advocate is heard in all future proceedings.

–IANS

janvi/dan

Go to Source

Disclaimer

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by TodayIndia.news and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website.

Through this website you are able to link to other websites which are not under the control of TodayIndia.news We have no control over the nature, content and availability of those sites. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.

Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, TodayIndia.news takes no responsibility for, and will not be liable for, the website being temporarily unavailable due to technical issues beyond our control.

For any legal details or query please visit original source link given with news or click on Go to Source.

Our translation service aims to offer the most accurate translation possible and we rarely experience any issues with news post. However, as the translation is carried out by third part tool there is a possibility for error to cause the occasional inaccuracy. We therefore require you to accept this disclaimer before confirming any translation news with us.

If you are not willing to accept this disclaimer then we recommend reading news post in its original language.

RELATED ARTICLES
- Advertisment -

Most Popular