HomeNational'We don’t design courses', Delhi HC rejects PIL seeking 4-year LLB course

‘We don’t design courses’, Delhi HC rejects PIL seeking 4-year LLB course

New Delhi, May 2 (IANS) The Delhi High Court on Thursday refused to entertain a PIL filed by BJP leader and advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay seeking the constitution of a ‘Legal Education Commission’ to evaluate the viability of a four-year LLB course.

Upholding the authority of educational bodies to determine the academic curricula, the court said it does not intervene in the domain of course design.

“We studied in a six-year education system after 12th. You’re asking us to change that. This isn’t our domain. We don’t design courses,” said a division bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Manmeet P.S. Arora.

The bench also said that the judiciary does not dictate educational policies and that decisions regarding course duration and structure fall under the purview of the educational authorities.

Responding to Upadhyay’s argument about the historical precedent of shorter LLB courses and the achievements of eminent legal luminaries, the bench stressed the need for continuous education and self-improvement throughout one’s career.

The court also expressed dissatisfaction with the depth of study reflected in the PIL, pointing out the dynamic nature of legal education, which incorporates interdisciplinary approaches and adapts to societal and technological advancements.

Rejecting the plea, the bench urged Upadhyay to channel his concerns through appropriate platforms, such as representations to the relevant authorities.

Upadhyay subsequently withdrew his plea.

Upadhyay had sought a directive from the Bar Council of India (BCI) to form an ‘Expert Committee’ comprising retired judges and jurists to assess the coherence of the five-year LLB course with the National Education Policy 2020.

The PIL argued that the existing LLB course structure is arbitrary and imposes unnecessary burdens on students, advocating for a transition to a four-year programme aligned with contemporary educational principles.

While the court acknowledged the petitioner’s concerns, it reiterated its stance on the judiciary’s limited role in educational matters and encouraged dialogue and engagement with regulatory bodies to address the perceived shortcomings in the legal education system.

–IANS

spr/arm

Go to Source

Disclaimer

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by TodayIndia.news and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website.

Through this website you are able to link to other websites which are not under the control of TodayIndia.news We have no control over the nature, content and availability of those sites. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.

Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, TodayIndia.news takes no responsibility for, and will not be liable for, the website being temporarily unavailable due to technical issues beyond our control.

For any legal details or query please visit original source link given with news or click on Go to Source.

Our translation service aims to offer the most accurate translation possible and we rarely experience any issues with news post. However, as the translation is carried out by third part tool there is a possibility for error to cause the occasional inaccuracy. We therefore require you to accept this disclaimer before confirming any translation news with us.

If you are not willing to accept this disclaimer then we recommend reading news post in its original language.

RELATED ARTICLES
- Advertisment -

Most Popular