‘Highly irresponsible’: SC castigates Nishikant Dubey over remarks on judiciary

0
7
<div>'Highly irresponsible': SC castigates Nishikant Dubey over remarks on judiciary</div>
Advetisment

New Delhi, May 8 (IANS) The Supreme Court has castigated BJP Lok Sabha member Nishikant Dubey over his “highly irresponsible” and “absurd” comments on the top court and the Chief Justice of India (CJI).

Amid ongoing hearings on the constitutionality of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, Nishikant Dubey, a Member of Parliament from Jharkhand’s Godda, during an interview, had said that “Chief Justice of India Sanjeev Khanna is responsible for all the civil wars happening in India” and “to provoke the religious war in this country, only and only the Supreme Court is responsible”.

“In our opinion, the comments were highly irresponsible and reflect a penchant to attract attention by casting aspersions on the Supreme Court of India and the Judges of the Supreme Court,” said a bench of CJI Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar, in its order, uploaded on the website of the apex court on Thursday.

Though the apex court refrained from entertaining a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking contempt of court action against Dubey, it said that courts need not protect their verdicts and decisions by taking recourse to the power of contempt.

However, the CJI Khanna-led Bench stressed that any attempt to spread communal hatred or indulge in hate speech must be dealt with an iron hand.

“Hate speech cannot be tolerated as it leads to loss of dignity and self-worth of the targeted group members, contributes to disharmony amongst groups, and erodes tolerance and open-mindedness, which is a must for a multi-cultural society committed to the idea of equality,” it said, adding that any attempt to cause alienation or humiliation of the targeted group is a criminal offence and must be dealt with accordingly.

In its order, the top court, after examining Dubey’s statement, said that the contents of his assertions tend to scandalise and lower the authority of the Supreme Court, if not interfere or tend to interfere with the judicial proceedings pending before the court, and have the tendency to interfere and obstruct the administration of justice.

Observing that there is no ‘civil war’ in India, the apex court said that judicial decisions are made in accordance with legal principles and not in keeping with political, religious or community considerations.

“Surely, courts and judges have shoulders broad enough and an implicit trust that the people would perceive and recognise when criticism or critique is biased, scandalous and ill-intentioned,” the CJI Khanna-led Bench added.

“We are of the firm opinion that courts are not as fragile as flowers to wither and wilt under such ludicrous statements. We do not believe that the confidence in and credibility of the courts in the eyes of the public can be shaken by such absurd statements, though it can be said without the shadow of doubt that there is a desire and deliberate attempt to do so,” said the top court.

The PIL filed by advocate Vishal Tiwari had said that the entire contents of Dubey’s interview were full of derogatory speech towards the judiciary and the Supreme Court. “Such acts amount to an offence punishable under BNS (Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita) and also under Section 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971,” it stated.

Refusing to entertain the plea seeking contempt action against Dubey, the CJI Khanna-led Bench, on Monday, had said: “We will pass a short order. We will not be entertaining it, but we will give a short order expressing our views.”

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) had dissociated itself from Nishikant Dubey’s comments against the Supreme Court, clarifying that the statements were “personal opinions” and do not reflect the party’s stance.

In a post on X, BJP chief J.P. Nadda distanced the party from the comments by the MPs. “The BJP has nothing to do with the statements made by BJP MPs Nishikant Dubey and Dinesh Sharma on the judiciary and the Chief Justice of the country. These are their personal statements, but the BJP neither agrees with such statements nor does it ever support such statements. The BJP completely rejects these statements,” Nadda had said.

–IANS

pds/vd

Go to Source

Disclaimer

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by TodayIndia.news and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website.

Through this website you are able to link to other websites which are not under the control of TodayIndia.news We have no control over the nature, content and availability of those sites. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.

Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, TodayIndia.news takes no responsibility for, and will not be liable for, the website being temporarily unavailable due to technical issues beyond our control.

For any legal details or query please visit original source link given with news or click on Go to Source.

Our translation service aims to offer the most accurate translation possible and we rarely experience any issues with news post. However, as the translation is carried out by third part tool there is a possibility for error to cause the occasional inaccuracy. We therefore require you to accept this disclaimer before confirming any translation news with us.

If you are not willing to accept this disclaimer then we recommend reading news post in its original language.

Advertisment