New Delhi, Nov 19 (IANS) The Supreme Court has upheld the termination of an LIC employee who absented himself from duty for 90 days without intimation to his employer.
A bench of Justices Hrishikesh Roy and SVN Bhatti was hearing a plea filed by LIC against the decision of the Himachal Pradesh High Court ordering the reinstatement of the delinquent employee with all consequential benefits.
In its impugned order, the HP High Court set aside the penalty of removal from service and said that the termination order was unsustainable on the grounds of not providing due opportunity.
The disciplinary authority considered the absence from duty by the delinquent employee to be a case of abandonment of service under Regulation 39(4)(iii) read with Explanation 1 of the LIC Staff Regulation.
The termination order noted that the delinquent, who was serving as an Assistant Administrative Officer in the LIC, failed to respond to the notices issued to him and his whereabouts were not known for over 90 days.
The letters addressed to him to resume duties remained unanswered, including the chargesheet-cum-show cause notice proposing his removal from service.
Thereafter, LIC considered it to be a case of abandonment of service and by invocation of powers under Regulation 39(4)(iii) ordered from removal of the delinquent employee.
Before the apex court, the LIC contended that the delinquent was absent from duty for 90 days without intimation to his employer and since the notices addressed to him remained unanswered, conducting an inquiry into the charge of unauthorised absence was an impossibility and the employer had rightly treated it to be a case of abandonment of service and terminated him.
In its judgment, the Supreme Court noted that the delinquent employee secured fresh employment with the FCI and concealed this fact in the writ petition.
“If this vital aspect was known the High Court possibly would have taken a different. view and the respondent (employee) abandoning his job with the LIC, could have been easily inferred,” it said.
Setting aside the HP High Court decision, the apex court for suppression of the fact of subsequent employment, the delinquent employee was disentitled to equitable relief from the high court under Article 226 of the Constitution.
“Such conduct of the respondent (employee) could not have been condoned by the employer and therefore, in our assessment, treating the respondent to have abandoned his service and taking appropriate action against him, in terms of the LIC Staff Regulation, cannot be faulted,” the Supreme Court said.
–IANS
pds/dan
Disclaimer
The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by TodayIndia.news and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website.
Through this website you are able to link to other websites which are not under the control of TodayIndia.news We have no control over the nature, content and availability of those sites. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.
Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, TodayIndia.news takes no responsibility for, and will not be liable for, the website being temporarily unavailable due to technical issues beyond our control.
For any legal details or query please visit original source link given with news or click on Go to Source.
Our translation service aims to offer the most accurate translation possible and we rarely experience any issues with news post. However, as the translation is carried out by third part tool there is a possibility for error to cause the occasional inaccuracy. We therefore require you to accept this disclaimer before confirming any translation news with us.
If you are not willing to accept this disclaimer then we recommend reading news post in its original language.
